E nterview in SolucionesONG with Raquel portal Vazquez, director Human Resources Red Spider, on this controversial agreement, signed by unions and challenged by several employers in the sector.
Gema Jiménez / SolucionesONG.org
Due to the large number of queries that different NGOs have sent the First Convention on Collective Action and Social Intervention State, talked to Raquel Vázquez, HR director of Red Spider, an entity that is part one of the employer which has challenged the agreement, to tell us what the current situation and the reasons for such a challenge.
On June 19, 2007, was published in the Official State Bulletin I Framework Collective Agreement State Intervention and Social Action, signed by the unions FSP-UGT and CCOO-FSAP on behalf of workers and enterprises Association Care Services Person (AESAP) on behalf of the sector entities.
Why has challenged the agreement?
All and all we know what our industry is heterogeneous, and therefore there are various opinions and reactions, each for their application and others against, and of course other reasons why we are for and why it is against.
Red Spider is part of the employers (Employer is the generic name given to the individual employer or employers 'associations - Source: Wikipedia) called' Association Organizations State Intervention and Social Action ', which are also part of the Red Cross, Caritas, SOS Children's Villages, English Association Against Cancer, etc. We explain that the main argument that the agreement is challenged not feel represented by the employers who negotiated the agreement (AESAP), with which they tried to talk several times without having achieved yet.
December 11 was to take place in the Social Chamber of the Audiencia Nacional, the view which would solve this and other challenges to other employers, but no specific date has been extended resolution. That same day, the ECO platform (platform workers and workers in the field of Social Intervention in the Community of Madrid) called a strike in the sector to defend the agreement.
Is it mandatory to benefit from the Convention? Raquel Vázquez
Both the ECO platform web indicate that it is mandatory to benefit from the agreement, regardless of who is in court. Until no resolution to the contrary, we must apply. However, each entity may negotiate with their employees how to carry it out, to be favorable to both parties.
The agreement is effective from January 1, 2007 until December 31, 2008, which means that even though it was published in June, adjust all the bullets from the January 1, 2007.
What entities must qualify for the Convention?
As indicated in the resolution published in the BOE, "the present Convention shall apply to all entities and companies, regardless of their legal status, develop programs and actions of Action and Social Intervention in Spain, performing and / or managing Professional Center, Resources, and care services to individuals, groups and communities, in order, first, to detect, prevent, mitigate or rectify situations of social risk and / or processes of social exclusion, and secondly, to promote processes of inclusion, reintegration, promotion and participation social. "
"will be affected by this agreement the fields of social action, as well as social work or social health, through the socio-cultural and socio-educational, psychosocial care, community involvement and socio-cultural and the areas of design and evaluation of social programs, as defined in this article.
"Each entity must identify, among the activities that are reflected in the resolution if it is included or not. However, it also indicates the same as the agreement "clears and absorbs any improvements that come with employees enjoying or through other agreements or binding rules, or by unilateral decisions of firms. If economic conditions or other purposes, that have come to enjoy by workers at the time of entry into force of this Collective Agreement would be higher, calculated annually to those in the same, we will continue implementing and abiding by those more favorable conditions that exceed the conventional. "
also be taken into account that there are provinces and regions have their own collective agreement of social intervention, as Bizkaia, the Community of Madrid (also is disputed) and the Comunidad Valenciana, etc. and other provinces is also being negotiated, Rachel tells us. However, the agreement sets the minimum state of other conventions, and even the conventions themselves, can only improve those conditions.
Why are unhappy with the agreement? Raquel Vázquez
indicates that they are unhappy with the text of the agreement in general, but what bothered them, that it has negotiated behind the backs "of the NGOs that comprise the English social fabric. Appreciates that there is a law regulating the work of institutions and believes that although the end was not approved by the challenges of the agreement, the ultimate goal is to ensure that they take into account in revising the agreement for 2009. Vázquez
also alludes that despite that the agreement has many positive points, it also has negative aspects that seriously hinder the continuation of many NGOs, such as that should be applied retroactively, ie from January 1, 2007, as many organizations are not prepared economically to meet these salary adjustments.
The employer is part of the Red Spider has also tried talking to the Public Administration with the intention to apply for its part an adaptation of the subsidies and increased budgets for NGOs to meet these payments, but have not yet received a reply.
However, as stated in the Resolution, entities that have suffered losses in last two financial years will be eligible to pick clause if communicated to the Joint Commission, in the same way that some institutions have the option of invoking a "gradual wage equalization" as stated in Clause transient I, if they meet certain requirements and provided that you contact the Joint Commission. Reflection
Before concluding this article, we wish to highlight from SolucionesONG.org that despite all the uncertainty surrounding the convention, many entities are grouped together and seeking common ground on one line or another, very positive. Also we note that a positive reflection on the need for rules to govern a number of social organizations and the implementation of common policies for personnel management work. It is a sign of the "majority" of the third sector.
Gema Jiménez / SolucionesONG.org
Due to the large number of queries that different NGOs have sent the First Convention on Collective Action and Social Intervention State, talked to Raquel Vázquez, HR director of Red Spider, an entity that is part one of the employer which has challenged the agreement, to tell us what the current situation and the reasons for such a challenge.
On June 19, 2007, was published in the Official State Bulletin I Framework Collective Agreement State Intervention and Social Action, signed by the unions FSP-UGT and CCOO-FSAP on behalf of workers and enterprises Association Care Services Person (AESAP) on behalf of the sector entities.
Why has challenged the agreement?
All and all we know what our industry is heterogeneous, and therefore there are various opinions and reactions, each for their application and others against, and of course other reasons why we are for and why it is against.
Red Spider is part of the employers (Employer is the generic name given to the individual employer or employers 'associations - Source: Wikipedia) called' Association Organizations State Intervention and Social Action ', which are also part of the Red Cross, Caritas, SOS Children's Villages, English Association Against Cancer, etc. We explain that the main argument that the agreement is challenged not feel represented by the employers who negotiated the agreement (AESAP), with which they tried to talk several times without having achieved yet.
December 11 was to take place in the Social Chamber of the Audiencia Nacional, the view which would solve this and other challenges to other employers, but no specific date has been extended resolution. That same day, the ECO platform (platform workers and workers in the field of Social Intervention in the Community of Madrid) called a strike in the sector to defend the agreement.
Is it mandatory to benefit from the Convention? Raquel Vázquez
Both the ECO platform web indicate that it is mandatory to benefit from the agreement, regardless of who is in court. Until no resolution to the contrary, we must apply. However, each entity may negotiate with their employees how to carry it out, to be favorable to both parties.
The agreement is effective from January 1, 2007 until December 31, 2008, which means that even though it was published in June, adjust all the bullets from the January 1, 2007.
What entities must qualify for the Convention?
As indicated in the resolution published in the BOE, "the present Convention shall apply to all entities and companies, regardless of their legal status, develop programs and actions of Action and Social Intervention in Spain, performing and / or managing Professional Center, Resources, and care services to individuals, groups and communities, in order, first, to detect, prevent, mitigate or rectify situations of social risk and / or processes of social exclusion, and secondly, to promote processes of inclusion, reintegration, promotion and participation social. "
"will be affected by this agreement the fields of social action, as well as social work or social health, through the socio-cultural and socio-educational, psychosocial care, community involvement and socio-cultural and the areas of design and evaluation of social programs, as defined in this article.
"Each entity must identify, among the activities that are reflected in the resolution if it is included or not. However, it also indicates the same as the agreement "clears and absorbs any improvements that come with employees enjoying or through other agreements or binding rules, or by unilateral decisions of firms. If economic conditions or other purposes, that have come to enjoy by workers at the time of entry into force of this Collective Agreement would be higher, calculated annually to those in the same, we will continue implementing and abiding by those more favorable conditions that exceed the conventional. "
also be taken into account that there are provinces and regions have their own collective agreement of social intervention, as Bizkaia, the Community of Madrid (also is disputed) and the Comunidad Valenciana, etc. and other provinces is also being negotiated, Rachel tells us. However, the agreement sets the minimum state of other conventions, and even the conventions themselves, can only improve those conditions.
Why are unhappy with the agreement? Raquel Vázquez
indicates that they are unhappy with the text of the agreement in general, but what bothered them, that it has negotiated behind the backs "of the NGOs that comprise the English social fabric. Appreciates that there is a law regulating the work of institutions and believes that although the end was not approved by the challenges of the agreement, the ultimate goal is to ensure that they take into account in revising the agreement for 2009. Vázquez
also alludes that despite that the agreement has many positive points, it also has negative aspects that seriously hinder the continuation of many NGOs, such as that should be applied retroactively, ie from January 1, 2007, as many organizations are not prepared economically to meet these salary adjustments.
The employer is part of the Red Spider has also tried talking to the Public Administration with the intention to apply for its part an adaptation of the subsidies and increased budgets for NGOs to meet these payments, but have not yet received a reply.
However, as stated in the Resolution, entities that have suffered losses in last two financial years will be eligible to pick clause if communicated to the Joint Commission, in the same way that some institutions have the option of invoking a "gradual wage equalization" as stated in Clause transient I, if they meet certain requirements and provided that you contact the Joint Commission. Reflection
Before concluding this article, we wish to highlight from SolucionesONG.org that despite all the uncertainty surrounding the convention, many entities are grouped together and seeking common ground on one line or another, very positive. Also we note that a positive reflection on the need for rules to govern a number of social organizations and the implementation of common policies for personnel management work. It is a sign of the "majority" of the third sector.
0 comments:
Post a Comment